keronzebra.blogg.se

Mbs smoothscroll
Mbs smoothscroll








Sublime: ~50s, smooth scrolling, instant jumping.Ītom: ~10s, smooth scrolling, very choppy jumping: ~5s loads per jump (also got some error messages about text too large for buffer)Ĭode: ~15s, scrolling somewhat choppy, quick jumping

mbs smoothscroll

I tried with two 1GB files, one with many lines but each short, another with long lines but not as many:Ĭode: ~10s, smooth scrolling, instant jumping. It really feels like it might be worth it, even just for the speed difference.Īh didn't realize it was the same account. $80 is reasonable for most use cases (developers, etc) but it's a bit steep for mine. I'm still debating (as a hobbyist that doesn't make much money on what I use text editors for) whether the license is worth it for Sublime or if I should just stick to VS Code.

mbs smoothscroll

It's hard to put into words how much better it feels to use, like the difference between using applications on a HDD vs an SSD. While the measured time doesn't seem significant- the "feel" of using it does. Though, I revisited Sublime Text today, and I have to say, I know it's just a few seconds saved here and there, but the difference between Sublime and ANY other editor as far as launch/file ready time is a huge gap. It's still faster than this new version of Atom for startup, especially cold starts (with it not open at all, going into FTP client > open file). MS seems to have done some good work on performance.

mbs smoothscroll

I've tried so many and like very few of them.

#Mbs smoothscroll code

I've been enjoying VS Code for a while after really trying to find a text-editor on Mac that fits my personal preferences (tab navigation, open new files in tabs in existing window, fast launch time, css syntax highlighting inside of an HTML file).








Mbs smoothscroll